NoticeApplications are open — join the founding team and help build the first student-led DFIR collective.
Our flagship project: a complete insider-threat investigation built on public evidence from NIST's CFReDS project.
5 items in the register. Hashes are recorded on acquisition and published when the case closes.
Source: the published evidence collection. Verify every copy before analysis.
Drop an evidence file here, or .
Nothing is uploaded — the hash is computed locally in your browser.
Length tells us the algorithm: 40 = SHA-1, 64 = SHA-256, 128 = SHA-512.
Week 1 — Acquisition & endpoint
Acquire the published images, verify every copy against its hash, then analyse the Windows 7 disk: filesystem, registry, event logs and browser history.
Week 2 — Cross-artefact correlation
Correlate USB connection and removal artefacts, CD-burning activity, email and cloud-sync records across the endpoint and removable media.
Week 3 — Timeline, report & review
Build the master incident timeline, write the report, and close with a 60-minute review where each role defends its findings.
Deliverables
Our flagship project: a complete insider-threat investigation built on public evidence from NIST's CFReDS project.
Every role in the collective has a defined job in this case, and the findings come together in a single final report.
A manager at a technology company secretly accepts money from a rival to leak confidential research. He plans it carefully: he discusses the deal over email, sends sample files through his personal cloud storage, and copies the rest onto USB drives and a CD. To cover his tracks he renames files to look harmless and runs secure-deletion tools.
At the company security checkpoint his devices are seized and sent to the forensic lab. Our job is to find the evidence of the leak and reconstruct exactly what he did, step by step.
Around 6 GB of public, legal practice images from the NIST CFReDS Data Leakage Case, free to download and documented with published hash values.
The case ships in DD and EnCase formats, and NIST publishes a reference solution, so we can check our findings against the ground truth. Source: NIST CFReDS Data Leakage Case.
All 13 roles have a defined job in this case. The evidence is disk and removable media, so the leadership, custody, endpoint, timeline, intelligence, legal and coordination roles drive the investigation. Where an artefact touches another speciality, such as cloud sync records or disguised media files, that role takes the thread. The remaining roles support with method review, tooling notes and quality checks on the final report.
Supporting in this case
Supporting in this case
Supporting in this case
Supporting in this case
Supporting in this case
Supporting in this case
A three-week pilot. Week one: acquisition, hashing and endpoint analysis. Week two: cross-artefact correlation across USB, CD, email and cloud evidence. Week three: timeline, reporting and review. The case closes with a 60-minute final review where each role defends its findings.
This case uses only public, legal practice material from NIST CFReDS. No real victim data, no live systems and no unauthorised investigation. We handle every artefact under chain-of-custody rules as if it were real evidence.
Case facts checked against NIST CFReDS on 18 Oct 2026. The schedule and the GitHub release are plans, not commitments.
FORENSYRA (2026). "Case File 001 — The Data Leakage Investigation". Case file, Planning.
https://www.forensyra.in/projects/case-file-001