NoticeApplications are open — join the founding team and help build the first student-led DFIR collective.
Our second planned investigation: a ransomware incident on a small file server, investigated as a live-compromise scenario.
5 items in the register. Hashes are recorded on acquisition and published when the case closes.
Source: the published evidence collection. Verify every copy before analysis.
Drop an evidence file here, or .
Nothing is uploaded — the hash is computed locally in your browser.
Length tells us the algorithm: 40 = SHA-1, 64 = SHA-256, 128 = SHA-512.
Week 1 — Volatile first
Capture and analyse memory before disk: running processes, injected code, C2 connections and any key material still resident. Establish the encryption start time from file timestamps.
Week 2 — How they got in
Work the endpoint and network evidence backwards: initial access, privilege escalation and lateral movement, corroborated across event logs, Prefetch and packet capture.
Week 3 — Impact, family and report
Identify the ransomware family from code and behavioural signatures, scope exactly what was encrypted, and produce a report written for a small business with no security team.
Deliverables
This is a constructed training scenario, written by FORENSYRA. It is not a real incident and contains no victim data. The techniques are drawn from publicly documented ransomware behaviour, and practice material comes from public sources. Treat every scenario detail as a teaching device, not a case record.
A 25-person accountancy firm runs a single Windows file server holding six years of client records. On a Monday morning, staff arrive to .locked extensions on every share and a ransom note in each root folder. Nothing was detected the week before.
Your job is to answer three questions honestly:
And one question that is easy to skip, and that a small business cares about most: what should they do differently tomorrow?
Case 001 is a disk-and-removable-media investigation. This one is built around time pressure and volatile evidence:
Practice material is assembled from public, legal sources and synthetic data we generate ourselves:
Every copy is hashed on receipt and recorded in the custody log before analysis begins.
All thirteen roles have a defined job. The heaviest load falls on the memory and malware, network, endpoint and timeline roles; the custody, legal and coordination roles keep the investigation defensible while the clock runs.
Three weeks. Week one is volatile-first acquisition and analysis. Week two works backwards from the encryption to initial access. Week three is identification, impact scoping and reporting, closing with a review where each role defends its findings against the others.
All analysis runs on synthetic and public practice material in isolated lab environments. Malware is never executed outside a segregated, snapshot-backed VM with no network access. No real victim data, no live systems, and no unauthorised investigation.
FORENSYRA (2026). "Case File 002 — The Encrypted Share". Case file, Planning.
https://www.forensyra.in/projects/case-file-002